MEDLINE Journals

    Human immunodeficiency virus counseling and testing practices among North Carolina providers.

    Authors

    Troccoli K, Pollard H, McMahon M, et al. 

    Institution

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, USA. ktroccoli@teenpregnancy.org

    Source

    Obstet Gynecol 2002 Sep; 100(3) :420-7.

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE
    To estimate the percentage of prenatal care providers who offer human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to pregnant women, investigate how strongly testing is encouraged, and explore testing barriers.
    METHODS
    Between January 2001 and March 2001, we sent surveys to 1381 prenatal care providers in North Carolina, comprised of obstetricians, family physicians who practice obstetrics, and nurse-midwives. A total of 653 questionnaires were returned.
    RESULTS
    Overall, 95.5% of providers who responded reported recommending HIV testing to all pregnant patients. Only 69.2% strongly recommend testing, with obstetricians (73.4%) and family physicians (70.1%) doing so at higher rates than nurse-midwives (55.9%). Almost all respondents (96.9%) strongly recommend testing for women they perceive to be high risk, whereas 39.7% strongly recommend testing to women who have had an HIV test in the past 6 months. When women refuse testing, 48.1% of practitioners inquire about the reason, and 28.2% reoffer the test at a future prenatal appointment. The most significant testing barriers were treating an HIV-positive woman (18.4%) and informing a patient she is HIV positive (14.8%). Respondents report that low literacy and culturally appropriate patient education materials would be most helpful to them.
    CONCLUSION
    Among respondents, most prenatal care providers report that they recommend HIV testing to all pregnant women. However, many respondents base their decision about how strongly to recommend HIV testing on an assessment of the woman's risk for HIV exposure. Significant barriers to offering HIV testing were associated with managing an HIV-positive patient. Providers were most in need of patient education materials.

    Mesh

    AIDS Serodiagnosis
    Adult
    Attitude of Health Personnel
    Counseling
    Female
    HIV Infections
    Health Care Surveys
    Health Personnel
    Humans
    Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical
    Mass Screening
    North Carolina
    Patient Education as Topic
    Physician's Practice Patterns
    Pregnancy
    Prenatal Care
    Probability
    Questionnaires
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases

    Language

    eng

    Pub Type(s)

    Journal Article

    PubMed ID

    12220759

    Content Manager
    Related Content

    Achieving universal HIV screening in prenatal care in the United States: provider persistence pays off.

    Prenatal HIV counseling, testing, and antiretroviral prophylaxis by obstetric and family medicine providers in Alabama.

    Prenatal HIV tests. Routine testing or informed choice?

    Maternity care providers' attitudes and practices concerning HIV testing during pregnancy; results of a survey of the Canterbury and upper South Island region.

    How do North Carolina prenatal care providers counsel and test pregnant women for HIV? Survey measures knowledge of HIV testing benefits.

    What are the barriers to offering HIV testing in an antenatal setting? A national study of obstetricians.

    The maternal and child health sites' practices regarding HIV education, counseling, and testing of women of reproductive age in Chicago: barriers to universal implementation.

    Revised recommendations for HIV screening of pregnant women.